Rocky Mountain Region GDP by Category: 1997-2015

US ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION GDP 1997-2007-2015 Ratio of Services Manufacturing & Govt.

States in US Rocky Mountain Economic Region

US Rocky Mountain Economic Region Gross Domestic Product (GDP) 2016 Q3 by State (BEA Component Id 200)In the Rocky Mountain Economic Region, private goods-producing industries contributed 21.5% to the region’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 1997, but this had fallen to 20.4% by 2015, a 5.1% fall in its share.

Nationally the GDP for private goods producing industries fell from 22.6% to 19% in the same period, a decline of 15.9%. This means that goods producing industries have declined at a slower rate in the Rocky Mountain region, and its share of the regional economy is above the national average.

The Index in the table below confirms that the goods-producing industries grew by 126% in dollar terms (Index 226 – 1997 100) in the Rocky Mountain region but by 75% nationally.

ROCKY MOUNTAIN GDP Q3 2016 $m

TABLE: Gross Domestic Product Ratio For Private Goods Production By State 1997 & 2015

The table below displays 4 columns of data for the gross domestic product of the private goods-producing industries.

  1. 2015: The percentage of the State’s GDP in 2015 from goods-producing industries;
  2. 1997: The percentage of the State’s GDP in 1997 from goods-producing industries;
  3. +/- 97/15: The points difference between columns 1 and 2;
  4. % Change: The percentage difference between columns 1 and 2;
  5. Index 97 -100: In $ terms, if the GDP of goods-producing industries was equal to 100 in 1997, what is it today? Using this index the relative performance by state since 1997 can be compared and understood. (e.g. If the reading is 150, it means the GDP in $ terms has increased by 50%. If another state has a reading of 200, it means it is performing twice as well as the state with a reading of 150.)

Region Selector Guide

StateRegion20151997+/- 1997-2015% ChangeIndex 97 =100
AlabamaSoutheast24.0%26.3%-2.4%-9.0%174
AlaskaFar West28.0%31.8%-3.8%-12.1%182
ArizonaSouthwest14.6%23.8%-9.2%-38.5%135
ArkansasSoutheast23.8%31.7%-8.0%-25.1%147
CaliforniaFar West16.7%20.2%-3.5%-17.2%190
ColoradoRocky Mountain17.8%18.6%-0.8%-4.5%221
ConnecticutNew England13.9%18.7%-4.8%-25.6%134
DelawareMideast11.3%16.8%-5.5%-32.5%138
District of ColumbiaMideast1.5%1.5%0.0%3.3%245
FloridaSoutheast10.5%13.8%-3.4%-24.2%167
GeorgiaSoutheast15.8%22.1%-6.3%-28.5%147
HawaiiFar West8.6%7.5%1.1%15.0%246
IdahoRocky Mountain23.8%26.8%-3.0%-11.2%197
IllinoisGreat Lakes17.5%21.9%-4.4%-20.1%147
IndianaGreat Lakes35.6%35.9%-0.3%-0.9%193
IowaPlains29.0%32.6%-3.6%-11.1%185
KansasPlains22.5%25.6%-3.1%-12.0%175
KentuckySoutheast26.8%35.2%-8.3%-23.7%141
LouisianaSoutheast33.2%31.3%1.9%6.2%215
MaineNew England15.2%20.8%-5.6%-26.8%137
MarylandMideast10.3%14.1%-3.8%-26.7%166
MassachusettsNew England13.8%18.8%-5.1%-26.9%149
MichiganGreat Lakes24.7%29.2%-4.5%-15.5%131
MinnesotaPlains21.4%22.9%-1.5%-6.6%195
MississippiSoutheast23.4%28.6%-5.1%-18.0%149
MissouriPlains18.3%23.5%-5.2%-22.2%140
MontanaRocky Mountain21.3%20.6%0.7%3.4%244
NebraskaPlains23.3%24.5%-1.2%-5.0%213
NevadaFar West11.6%17.0%-5.4%-31.6%159
New HampshireNew England14.4%26.6%-12.2%-45.9%104
New JerseyMideast12.1%18.3%-6.2%-34.0%122
New MexicoSouthwest19.5%31.4%-11.9%-37.9%110
New YorkMideast8.5%11.0%-2.5%-22.4%156
North CarolinaSoutheast24.6%33.9%-9.3%-27.6%154
North DakotaPlains33.2%21.2%12.0%56.7%555
OhioGreat Lakes23.4%29.6%-6.2%-20.9%141
OklahomaSouthwest28.3%25.8%2.4%9.4%255
OregonFar West28.5%27.8%0.8%2.8%222
PennsylvaniaMideast19.2%24.4%-5.2%-21.4%157
Rhode IslandNew England12.2%18.9%-6.7%-35.3%125
South CarolinaSoutheast22.1%29.1%-7.0%-24.1%155
South DakotaPlains21.5%26.2%-4.7%-18.0%202
TennesseeSoutheast20.9%26.8%-5.9%-21.9%159
TexasSouthwest29.7%28.1%1.6%5.6%280
UtahRocky Mountain20.2%22.9%-2.6%-11.5%229
VermontNew England14.7%22.4%-7.7%-34.3%127
VirginiaSoutheast13.8%18.4%-4.6%-25.1%165
WashingtonFar West18.8%22.0%-3.2%-14.7%196
West VirginiaSoutheast29.4%28.6%0.7%2.6%197
WisconsinGreat Lakes25.0%31.0%-5.9%-19.1%157
WyomingRocky Mountain35.4%34.1%1.3%3.7%281
New EnglandNew England13.9%19.6%-5.7%-29.1%138
MideastMideast11.5%15.5%-4.0%-25.8%150
Far WestFar West17.5%20.7%-3.2%-15.5%193
SoutheastSoutheast19.0%24.4%-5.4%-22.1%162
Great LakesGreat Lakes23.6%28.1%-4.5%-16.0%150
Rocky MountainRocky Mountain20.4%21.5%-1.1%-5.1%226
USAUSA19.0%22.6%-3.6%-15.9%176
PlainsPlains22.6%25.1%-2.5%-10.0%186
SouthwestSouthwest27.2%27.5%-0.3%-1.1%247

Colorado’s GDP from goods-producing industries is down to 17.8%

The 2015 value of Colorado’s GDP from goods-producing industries at 17.8% is below average for the Rocky Mountain region, but by declining 4.3% since 1997, it is falling a little slower than the region’s average.

As was noted in some of the Plains states, the goods-producing industries share of Colorado’s GDP actually increased to 19.1% in 2007 from 18.6% in 1997, before falling to 17.8% in 2015. The decline in share has therefore all occurred since 2015.

The Index of 221 confirms the value of Colorado’s goods-production is increasing well above the national average (176) and in line with the regional average of 226.

The value of Colorado’s GDP in 2016 Q3 was $325bn, the 19th largest in the country, just behind Tennessee and above Wisconsin. Colorado’s economy is bigger than the combined economies of the other states in the Rocky Mountain region, so it will have a significant impact on the regional statistics.

Colorado GDP 1997-2007-2015 Ratio of Services, Manufacturing & Govt.

Idaho’s GDP from goods-producing industries is down to 23.8%

The 2015 value of Idaho’s GDP from goods-producing industries at 23.8% is above the average for the Rocky Mountain region, but by declining 11.2% since 1997, it is falling twice as fast as the region’s average.

The Index of 197 confirms the value of Idaho’s goods-production is increasing above the national average (176) but is down on the regional average of 226.

The value of Idaho’s GDP in 2016 Q3 was $68bn, the 9th smallest in the country, ahead of Maine and behind Delaware.

Idaho GDP 1997-2007-2015 Ratio of Services, Manufacturing & Govt.

Montana’s GDP from goods-producing industries is down to 21.3%

The 2015 value of Montana’s GDP from goods-producing industries at 21.3% is just above the average for the Rocky Mountain region. Montana is one of only 10 states where the 2015 share is up on 1997, increasing from 20.6%, or 3.3%.

The Index of 244 confirms the value of Montana’s goods-production is increasing above the national average (176) and the regional average of 226.

The value of Montana’s GDP in 2016 Q3 was $46bn, the 3rd smallest in the country, ahead of Wyoming and behind South Dakota.

Montana GDP 1997-2007-2015 Ratio of Services, Manufacturing & Govt.

Utah’s GDP from goods-producing industries is down to 20.2%

The 2015 value of Utah’s GDP from goods-producing industries at 20.2% is just below the average for the Rocky Mountain region. This has declined 11.7% since 1997 from 22.9%, twice as fast as the region’s average.

The Index of 229 confirms the value of Utah’s goods-production is increasing above the national average (176) and is similar to the regional average of 226.

The value of Utah’s GDP in 2016 Q3 was $157bn, the 31st largest in the country, ahead of Kansas and behind Iowa. It accounts for 25% of the Rocky Mountain regional economy.

Utah GDP 1997-2007-2015 Ratio of Services, Manufacturing & Govt.

Wyoming’s GDP from goods-producing industries is down to 35.4%

The 2015 value of /Wyoming’s GDP from goods-producing industries at 35.4% is just above the average for the Rocky Mountain region. Wyoming is one of only 10 states where the 2015 share is up on 1997, increasing from 34.1%, or 3.8%.

The Index of 281 confirms Wyoming’s goods-production is increasing well above the national average (176) and the regional average of 226. This is the second largest increase, behind North Dakota (555) and similar to Texas (280).

The value of Wyoming’s GDP in 2016 Q3 was $38bn, the 2nd smallest in the country, ahead of Vermont and behind Montana and South Dakota.

Wyoming GDP 1997-2007-2015 Ratio of Services, Manufacturing & Govt.

BEA Source of Data Citation

BEA definition of Gross Domestic Product

Previous articlePlains Region GDP by Category 1997-2015
Next articleHow The Ratio of GDP from Goods-Production Declined by US Region 1997-2015
I am a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland and former CEO & CFO of International retail brands in the USA & UK, where I lived for almost 15 years. I've visited, worked or lived in 37 US States (so far), and even spent 3rd grade at the Sacred Heart School in Leavenworth, Kansas. I currently live in Ireland with my wife of 30 years, as our two kids make their way in life in London and Chicago. I have witnessed two economic crashes in my working life and believe there is an easier way for people to turn top line economic data into knowledge, without becoming an economist. The economyofstates.com is my attempt to achieve that objective and I hope you find it worthwhile dropping by.